|
By nearly all
measures, the City’s economy is healthy and growing. As of June
1999, the City’s unemployment rate was 2.5%, compared to the State’s
rate of 3.2%, and the national rate of 4.5%. The City’s monthly
unemployment rate consistently has remained approximately twice
as low as the National rate. The number of jobs in the City, at
87,424, has hit the highest point in the City’s history with many
of those new jobs in the high-tech arena. New commercial construction
in the City is trending ahead of last year through the first quarter
of 1999, and both the number of residential properties sold in the
City and the average price for residential property (including new
residential construction) have increased compared to last year.
While the
City’s current revenue projections assume that the real property
tax base will continue to grow in the near future, the fundamental
challenge for the City is that our projected revenue growth will
not provide sufficient new revenues to fund all of the City’s expenditure
demands, particularly in light of looming additional capital funding
requests, such as up to $21 million to address middle school capacity
issues in the Alexandria City Public Schools.
Much of the
projected new revenue growth in FY 2001 already has been earmarked
to fund the additional operating budget costs that will result from
current projects, such as the new elementary school, the new Charles
E. Beatley, Jr. Library, and the increased costs for repayment of
the principal and interest on the new borrowing the City has undertaken
to fund capital projects. As a result of these additional immediate
expenditure demands, City Council will face significant challenges
in the coming year to identify funding sources for other new initiatives,
such as expanded capital improvement program funding for the Schools
and for other City operating and capital projects.
|
|
Located
in the West End, Landmark Mall is the City’s major retail shopping
center. Retail sales for CY 1999 increased 6%, on top of a 7% increase
in CY 1998.
|
| Local
Government Revenue Long Term Issues |
|
The City remains
heavily dependent on the tax on the value of real property for the
majority of the revenue necessary to finance local government services,
with real property tax revenues currently providing 47% of the local
revenue used for City and School services. Despite the new construction
that has occurred over the last decade, our real property tax base
has grown by less than one-half of 1% since 1991. This is because
the drop in values in the 1990s was so large that it took five years
of growth in the late 1990s just to gain this small overall net
growth of less than one-half of 1%. The stagnation in existing real
estate values during most of the 1990s has focused attention on
the role new commercial and residential growth plays in sustaining
the fiscal health of the City.
As a small
City of less than 16 square miles that is almost entirely developed,
Alexandria has limited opportunities to count on a growing real
property tax base to help address the Citys future funding
needs. Development decisions that are made in the near future, with
regard to key vacant land sites the Carlyle site and Potomac
Yard, in particular will have long term impacts on the fiscal
health of the City and the expansion of the Citys tax base.
While the potential revenue from new development may be significant,
it is important to note that it will take many years before the
City actually reaps the benefits. Full build-out at Potomac Yard,
for example, is estimated to take up to 20 years. As a result, the
development decisions facing City Council at this time are key to
the future economic health of the City, but will do little to alleviate
immediate funding pressures for the FY 2001 budget.
In addition,
depending upon the outcome of State legislative initiatives, the
Citys revenue base could be impacted more immediately. The
Virginia General Assembly has approved a study of the State and
local tax structure, and the relationship between State and local
taxing authority and service responsibilities. Although this study
is not yet underway, proposals have been discussed by State elected
officials that could limit local taxing authority, but no offsetting
reduction in local service responsibilities has accompanied these
early tax relief discussions at the State level. It remains unclear
at this time whether the State would forward new State aid to localities
to compensate localities for lost revenues under some of the proposals.
Also, there are proposals to share State income tax revenues with
localities as a way of diversifying local revenue sources.
|
|
In July,
Washington Real Estate Investment Trust completed a $2.2 million
renovation of Bradlee Shopping Center. The shopping center features
several new tenants, including the Washington Sports Club and Chicken
Out.
|
| Capital
Improvement Program Issues |
|
With the Citys
current plans to borrow an additional $80 million by FY 2003 for
capital projects, maintaining the Aaa/AAA ratings from Moodys
and Standard & Poors is important to ensure that the City is
able to borrow this money at the lowest possible interest rate.
While additional borrowing is necessary to finance the current $118
million program of capital projects for the City and the Schools,
repayment of this new debt will have a significant impact on future
annual operating budgets. As a result of additional borrowing already
planned, the projected annual cost for debt service payments will
increase from $8.9 million in FY 2000 to approximately $14.6 million
in the FY 2004 budget.
However, the
current $118 million six-year capital program leaves unfunded many
projects that have been requested or discussed by the community.
The largest of these unfunded projects is the School Boards
request for $21 million to address capacity issues at the Citys
two middle schools, but many other unfunded costly capital projects
also have been discussed in recent months, including transportation
improvements to the Monroe Avenue Bridge on U.S. Route 1; a new
community center at Cameron Station; a new Visitor Center; renovations
to aging City facilities, including the Health Department; infrastructure
maintenance, including sewer systems; capital costs for transit
both the Citys local bus system, DASH and the regional
Metro bus and rail systems.
With the City
already embarking on more borrowing for capital projects than it
has in more than a decade, the City and the Schools must prioritize
capital requests to ensure that the City is able to abide by the
Citys adopted financial policies, as well as manage the annual
increasing cost to repay this debt from future operating budgets.
The City simply cannot afford to fund all of the capital requests
within a six-year time frame and, as a result, some projects will
need to be deferred or phased into the capital program over a longer
time frame to ensure that available funding sources are targeted
toward essential maintenance and infrastructure needs.
Another strategy
to consider for funding capital projects is to aggressively pursue
non-City sources of funding, including federal and State aid for
capital projects, grants and private funding. The City is currently
considering a City-sponsored development office that may be able
to assist with pursuing private support for capital projects, perhaps
in exchange for naming opportunities; however, this effort may require
a longer start-up period before it becomes effective in helping
the City meet its capital needs.
Given the
longer time frames that may be required to address all of the capital
requests, the City Council will need to review carefully the costs
and benefits of pursuing continuing periodic bond issuance after
FY 2004. Any additional borrowing will need to be accommodated within
the financial policy debt ratios so that additional debt service
would not burden future operating budgets. This approach would require
a sound presentation to the municipal credit rating agencies, ensuring
that the Citys tax base can sustain additional tax-supported
debt and that the City can manage an increased overall debt burden,
ultimately maintaining the Citys bond ratings.
|
 |
The Pride
II of Baltimore, Marylands goodwill ambassador, is the only
existing example of an 1812-era Baltimore Clipper Topsail Schooner.
The schooner was on display at Alexandrias Founders
Park in May. Attractions like these play an important role in drawing
tourists to Alexandria.
|
|